|
| To say hospital services would
double is a significant overstatement. While Advanced Healthcare and Aurora
Health Care have yet to design the Grafton medical center, we anticipate a
hospital with 80 to 90 beds. That would be less than half the size of St.
Marys Ozaukee in Mequon. |
| The whole notion of duplication
of services has no place in a free market. |
| We would do well to allow health
care consumers to decide what is needed and what is not needed. |
|
|

Editorial: Too much health care?
Hospital services are about to double in Ozaukee County; the
Village of Grafton will benefit, but health care bill payers likely
wont
Ozaukee Press, August 16, 2007
If the health business worked like other enterprises in the
American economy, the news that Aurora Health Care plans to build a
hospital in Grafton should have Ozaukee County residents dancing in
the streets.
If the law of supply and demand worked in health care, Auroras
plan,
which
would just about double the supply of hospital services here, would
reduce health costs in the county.
But that is not going to happen because, like a drug-resistant
virus, the health care industry does not respond to the market
influences that
affect
other businesses. Time and again, experience has shown competition
does not cause the prices of health services to fall.
The fact that most fundamental economic rules do not work for
health care ought to be taken as a hint that the answers to
Americas health care problems wont be found in so-called
market-based solutions.
The market so far has failed the American health-care delivery
system, which is in poor health in terms of accessibility to
services and measures of the health of the U.S. population compared
to that of other developed nations. The health care business, on the
other hand, is the picture of vitality, as Auroras bold moves
attest.
It is estimated that Aurora is spending nearly half a billion
dollars to build a hospital in Waukesha County, buy Advanced
Healthcare, which operates clinics in Port Washington and Grafton
and other locations in the area, and build the hospital in Grafton.
The Grafton hospital will be located just up the road from the
sprawling,
currently
expanding Columbia St. Marys Hospital in Mequon. Services will be
duplicated on a prodigious scale.
Someone
will have to pay for this excess. Studies have shown that areas with
more hospitals and related services have higher health care costs,
though not necessarily better health for their residents.
While Auroras announcement raises red flags for the cost of
health care in an area that already is burdened with some of the
highest health costs in the country, its hardly bad news when
viewed from other perspectives.
The hospital, representing an investment that might approach $200
million, will be Grade-A development, an economic boon to Ozaukee
County and especially the Village of Grafton. It will bring jobs,
auxiliary development and new residents, some of them health care
professionals representing lofty demographic categories.
Grafton will realize intangible benefits as well, such as the
pride of being home to what may be a state-of-the art medical
institution and the security its residents will feel living near
first-rate medical services.
In fact, if a second hospital within five miles of another in
Ozaukee County were really needed, we would all be cheering. But
need is the
unanswered
question. In some states, notably Minnesota, where health care costs
are markedly lower than Wisconsins, hospitals cannot be built
without proving the need for the facilities. Not so in Wisconsin.
Here the health care businesses decide how many hospitals will be
built. That would be a laudable expression of the private enterprise
system if health care followed the economic
rules.
That it doesnt is one more argument in favor of government-managed
health care.
|
|
| Competition holds the
same benefits in health care as it does in every other sector of
our economy. It improves the quality of care, improves service,
drives innovation and acts as a check on the growth of costs.
Perhaps the most exhaustive study of competition in health care
was conducted by the Federal Trade Commission and the Department
of Justice, which issued a report in 2004 titled Improving
Health Care: A Dose of Competition. To read the news release
issued by the agencies,
click here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The studies to which
this refers have been debated for decades by health care
economists. The empirical evidence that supply drives demand in
health care is mixed at best. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A government-run
system would not serve the interest of achieving high quality,
cost-effective, accessible health care services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|