
A war of words in the Aurora hospital debate
Oconomowoc Focus, June 1, 2006
Jonna Clark
staff writer
City of Oconomowoc - Reaction came this week to Judge James
Kieffer's ruling last week in favor of Aurora Health Care's
Oconomowoc hospital bid.
First
to weigh in: Concerned Businesses for Responsible Health Care (CBRHC),
a group of 100 businesses opposed to Aurora building in the city or
the Town of Summit.
"As a result of this decision, the real losers are the business
owners and rate payers who will be forced to pay for this hospital,"
said Bill Nantell, co-chairman of the CBRHC and president of Wind
Lake Solutions.
Nantell is a Waukesha Memorial Hospital (WMH) board member. WMH
and Oconomowoc Memorial Hospital (OMH) are owned by ProHealth Care.
ProHealth
officials have publicly opposed Aurora's plans to build three miles
from OMH, calling the move a duplication of services.
"For its arguments to be credible, the business group would have
to also oppose ProHealth's plans to rebuild Oconomowoc Memorial
Hospital at a cost of more than $80 million," Aurora spokesman Jeff
Squire said.
CBRHC
has not commented on ProHealth's new building projects yet, but
Nantell said the membership of his group has expressed a desire to
meet with ProHealth officials for an explanation of the rationale
behind the expansions.
Nantell also said his group would contact the Oconomowoc Chamber
of Commerce to invite its membership to listen in.
Sandra Peterson, spokeswoman for ProHealth, said ProHealth is not
commenting on last week's ruling, but that it does understand the
concern in the business community about healthcare costs.
"ProHealth's
approach, spending less than $37 million to renovate the existing
hospital, is the most fiscally responsible way to continue meeting
the healthcare needs of our community," Peterson said.
"There
is no need for businesses and the entire community to foot the bill
for the capital costs of Aurora's $166 million hospital and all of
the ongoing operational and staffing expenses it will have for many
decades to come," she added.
ProHealth's new projects announced last month include a $2
million contribution to the new Oconomowoc Physicians Center, an
85,000-square-foot, office building that will be attached to the
current medical clinic, and $37 million worth of renovations for OMH
scheduled to begin in spring 2007.
Kieffer decided last Thursday that the city illegally rezoned
land as a means of blocking Aurora's bid to build an 88-bed hospital
in Pabst Farms.
Nantell said that while the court's decision is a setback for
opponents of Aurora's push to build an 88-bed hospital in the area,
the business community will once again rally in support of efforts
to oppose the duplication of services and excess capacity that the
new hospital would bring.
Kieffer made several key rulings last week on motions filed in
2001 against the city by Aurora.
The third Circuit Court judge to get the lawsuit, Kieffer ruled
that the city violated its own municipal code by not filing a
petition of the rezoning plan before the Plan Commission and Common
Council acted.
In
2001, the city rezoned a 44-acre parcel in Pabst Farms from
commercial to industrial. An industrial designation does not allow
for construction of a hospital.
In court, the city said a formal zoning petition was not
necessary, but Kieffer called that position unreasonable and pointed
to the city's zoning policies and ordinance, which call for review
of applications by city planners and administrators.
Kieffer also ruled that city officials violated state
open-meetings law by not being able to prove that notice of their
April 2001 meeting was properly posted.
"The court determined that there was an error of process, not of
intent," Nantell said, but, in his opinion, Kieffer said the Common
Council knew its decision to rezone the land in Pabst Farms would
"harm" Aurora.
Following Kieffer's ruling, Aurora's builder dropped off an
application for a special use permit to City Hall that same day, and
officials said they would like to start construction on Parcel 5 in
Pabst Farms as soon as this fall.
The Common Council will meet in closed session this week to
review the case with the city's attorneys and mull their response,
said Diane Gard, city administrator.
"Oconomowoc's
City Council needs to resist the temptation to succumb to Aurora's
bullying tactics and stay the course," Nantell said. "The
environment hasn't changed, there's no more a need for an additional
88-bed hospital today than there was back in 2001."
|